Health News

Strength Training Overcomes Bone Effects of Vegan Diet

People who maintain a vegan diet show significant deficits in bone microarchitecture compared with omnivores; however, resistance training not only appears to improve those deficits but may have a stronger effect in vegans, suggesting an important strategy in maintaining bone health with a vegan diet.

“We expected better bone structure in both vegans and omnivores who reported resistance training,” first author Robert Wakolbinger-Habel, MD, PhD, of St. Vincent Hospital Vienna and the Medical University of Vienna, Austria, told Medscape Medical News.

“However, we expected [there would still be] differences in structure between vegans and omnivores [who practiced resistance training], as previous literature reported higher fracture rates in vegans,” he said.

“Still, the positive message is that ‘pumping iron’ could counterbalance these differences between vegans and omnivores.”

The research was published online August 4 in The Endocrine Society’s Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism.

Exercise Significantly Impacts Bone Health in Vegans

The potential effects of the plant-based vegan diet on bone health have been reported in studies linking the diet to an increased risk of fractures and lower bone mineral density (BMD), with common theories including lower bone- and muscle-building protein in vegan diets.

However, most previous studies have not considered other key factors, such as the effects of exercise, the authors note.

“While previous studies on bone health in vegans only took BMD, biochemical and nutritional parameters into account, they did not consider the significant effects of physical activity,” they write.

“By ignoring these effects, important factors influencing bone health are neglected.”

For the study, 88 participants were enrolled in Vienna, Austria, with vegan participants recruited with the help of the Austrian Vegan Society.

Importantly, the study documented participants’ bone microarchitecture, a key measure of bone strength that has also not been previously investigated in vegans, using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT).

Inclusion criteria included maintaining an omnivore diet of meat and plant-based foods or a vegan diet for at least 5 years, not being underweight or obese (body mass index [BMI], 18.5-30 kg/m2), being age 30-50 years, and being premenopausal.

Of the participants, 43 were vegan and 45 were omnivores, with generally equal ratios of men and women.

Vegan Bone Deficits Disappear With Strength Training

Overall, compared with omnivores, the vegan group showed significant deficits in 7 of 14 measures of BMI-adjusted trabecular and cortical structure (all P < .05).

Among participants who reported no resistance training, vegans still showed significant decreases in bone microarchitecture compared with omnivores, including radius trabecular BMD, radius trabecular bone volume fraction, and other tibial and cortical bone microarchitecture measures.

However, among those who did report progressive resistant training (20 vegans and 25 omnivores), defined as using machines, free weights, or bodyweight resistance exercises at least once a week, those differences disappeared and there were no significant differences in BMI-adjusted bone microarchitecture between vegans and omnivores after the 5 years.

Of note, no significant differences in bone microarchitecture were observed between those who performed exclusively aerobic activities and those who reported no sports activities in the vegan or omnivore group.

Based on the findings, “other types of exercise such as aerobics, cycling, etc, would not be sufficient for a similar positive effect on bone [as resistance training],” Wakolbinger-Habel said.

Although the findings suggest that resistance training seemed to allow vegans to “catch up” with omnivores in terms of bone microarchitecture, Wakolbinger-Habel cautioned that a study limitation is the relatively low number of participants.

“The absolute numbers suggest that in vegans the differences, and the relative effect, respectively of resistance training might be larger,” he said.

“However, the number of participants in the subgroups is small and it is still an observational study, so we need to be careful in drawing causal conclusions.”

Serum bone markers were within normal ranges across all subgroups.

And although there were some correlations between nutrient intake and bone microarchitecture among vegans who did and did not practice resistance training, no conclusions could be drawn from that data, the authors note.

“Based on our data, the structural [differences between vegans and omnivores] cannot solely be explained by deficits in certain nutrients according to lifestyle,” the authors conclude.

Mechanisms

The mechanisms by which progressive resistance training could result in the benefits include that mechanical loads trigger stimulation of key pathways involved in bone formation, or mechanotransduction, the authors explain.

The unique effects have been observed in other studies, including one study showing that among young adult runners, the addition of resistance training once a week was associated with significantly greater BMD.

“Veganism is a global trend with strongly increasing numbers of people worldwide adhering to a purely plant-based diet,” first author Christian Muschitz, MD, also of St. Vincent Hospital Vienna and the Medical University of Vienna, said in a press statement.

“Our study showed resistance training offsets diminished bone structure in vegan people when compared to omnivores,” he said.

First author Wakolbinger-Habel recommended that, based on the findings, “exercise, including resistance training, should be strongly advocated [for vegans], I would say, at least two times per week.”

The authors have reported no relevant financial relationships.

J Clin Endocrinol Metab. Published online August 4, 2022. Abstract

Follow Medscape on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and YouTube.

Source: Read Full Article